<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jay Leishman &#187; Double opt in? Only for idiots&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jayleishman.com/tag/double-opt-in-only-for-idiots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jayleishman.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Double opt in? Only for idiots&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jayleishman.com/double-opt-in-only-for-idiots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jayleishman.com/double-opt-in-only-for-idiots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Leishman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double opt in? Only for idiots...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jayleishman.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to preach about double optin all the time. Infact I was so double opt in&#8230;. I loved and never had to worry about the settings that Aweber has set up. It&#8217;s defaulted to double&#8230; Whew&#8230;. I never have to worry about another spam complaint even if they are double&#8230;. whew&#8230;
That was then&#8230; this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to preach about double optin all the time. Infact I was so double opt in&#8230;. I loved and never had to worry about the settings that Aweber has set up. It&#8217;s defaulted to double&#8230; Whew&#8230;. I never have to worry about another spam complaint even if they are double&#8230;. whew&#8230;</p>
<p>That was then&#8230; this is now. If you are still using double opt in you are behind the times. First of all, you&#8217;re probably using double for a few reasons&#8230;</p>
<p>1. you&#8217;re scared you will get a complaint and be shut down.</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s what everyone else is doing.</p>
<p>3. Cuz you see others saying, &#8220;white list my email and check and confirm and yadadadada&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a campaign right now to a squeeze page. I&#8217;m in the test phase. I do that so I can set up my split testing. I&#8217;m looking at a 20% opt in rate to my UGLY page. Seriously it&#8217;s so ugly.  It&#8217;s so ugly&#8230; I don&#8217;t want to show you. JK&#8230; I don&#8217;t like showing my niches.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the math.</p>
<p>120 hits in one day</p>
<p>24 signed up with a legit email asking for more info in exchange for my bribe.</p>
<p>= 20% opt in rate.</p>
<p>********* ONLY 3 DOUBLE OPTED IN AND CLICKED ON THE LINK IN THEIR EMAIL*********</p>
<p>Pathetic. So let&#8217;s do the Math again&#8230;. that&#8217;s 2.5% opt in rate. I won&#8217;t go anywhere with that. Get single opt in from now on like I do. 20+% vs. 2.5%??????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jayleishman.com/double-opt-in-only-for-idiots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
